Weblog

Friday, 05 October 2007

  • Mormonism

    I was sitting in Salt Lake City airport with very little to do when my friend and I decided to purchase a book for our final flight to Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. I decided on "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis. (A fantastic read by the way.) As I was checking out a small book caught my eye - the Book of Mormon. "Hmm." I thought, "I don't really know what Mormons believe - guess I should find out."

    Now, I try and approach new things with as little bias as possible - (Though, absolute unbias is absolutely unattainable and to think otherwise would be blatant denial.) but I immediately learned enough to know that the Book of Mormon is a false teaching.

    The third page of the entire book loudly proclaims:

    THE
    BOOK OF MORMON
    Another Testament
    of Jesus Christ

    Wow. I'd like to focus on just one word - "Another".

    Galatians 1:8 says, "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!"

    Do I really need to say anything else? If you are a Mormon: how do you explain such a straightforward condemnation of your religious text? I want you to understand that this question is not rhetorical. I'm very curious what any Mormon has to say about it. I am not looking to bash you, so please leave me a comment if you have any thoughts. (Mormon or otherwise.)

    Next, let's deal with Joseph Smith (Jr.) the founder of the church of Latter Day Saints (LDS).

    "President Smith then stated that the meeting had been called, because God had commanded it; and it was made known to him by vision and by the Holy Spirit. . . . it was the will of God that they should be ordained to the ministry and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, for the coming of the Lord, which was nigh — even fifty six years should wind up the scene. (History of the Church, Vol. 2, page 182)."

    Jesus hasn't returned far more than 56 years later.

    Matthew 24:36 says, "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, [nor the Son(a), but only the Father." (a) * Some manuscripts do not have, "nor the Son".

    So how did Joseph Smith know when Jesus was returning? Well, he didn't and Jesus did not return when he said He would. This makes Joseph Smith a false prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:22, which says: "If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him."

    This is just one prophecy that never came to pass. You can find more, here: http://www.irr.org/mit/jsfalpro.html

    Now I also found some disturbing things in "Joseph Smith - History" verses 30 - 32.

    "30 While I was thus in the act of calling upon God, I discovered a alight appearing in my room, which continued to increase until the room was lighter than at noonday, when immediately a bpersonage appeared at my bedside, standing in the air, for his feet did not touch the floor.
      31 He had on a loose robe of most exquisite awhiteness. It was a whiteness beyond anything earthly I had ever seen; nor do I believe that any earthly thing could be made to appear so exceedingly white and brilliant. His hands were naked, and his arms also, a little above the wrist; so, also, were his feet naked, as were his legs, a little above the ankles. His head and neck were also bare. I could discover that he had no other clothing on but this robe, as it was open, so that I could see into his bosom.
      32 Not only was his robe exceedingly white, but his whole person was aglorious beyond description, and his countenance truly like blightning. The room was exceedingly light, but not so very bright as immediately around his person. When I first looked upon him, I was cafraid; but the dfear soon left me."

    (Copied from: http://scriptures.lds.org/js_h/1)

    2 Corinthians 11:14 says, ". . .Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light."

    It is very interesting to me how Joseph Smith describes this angel that came to him. He says, "I discovered a light appearing in my room, which continued to increase until the room was lighter than at noonday, when immediately a personage appeared at my bedside, standing in the air, for his feet did not touch the floor." He continues, "Not only was his robe exceedingly white, but his whole person was glorious beyond description, and his countenance truly like lightning. The room was exceedingly light, but not so very bright as immediately around his person."

    Interesting. Now I don't want to sound too much like the "Church Lady" from Saturday Night Live but I must ask.

    Who could this angel be? Who could it be, who could it be . . .could it be . . . SATAN? I find this explanation far more reasonable than it being a previously unmentioned angel (in all of scripture) named, "Moroni".

    Mormonism is tough for me to tackle because it's beliefs are in many ways very similar to my own. But these are not my beliefs and I want to make that extremely clear. I believe Joseph Smith was a false prophet and I believe the book of mormon (I decided it wasn't worthy of caps anymore) is a fraud. If you are a believer in Jesus Christ and Mormon, I urge you, as a brother in Christ, to leave this false "religion".

    As always, I'm open to and desirous of your comments!

    Cheers,
    Cody

Saturday, 22 September 2007

  • "Statistically Improbable"

    "However statistically improbable the entity you seek to explain by invoking a designer, the designer himself has got to be at least as improbable. . . . "

     - Richard Dawkins [The God Delusion]

    I completely agree with Mr. Dawkin's on his quote above. Explaining Man (a statistical improbability) requires a God that is (at least) just as statistically improbable as man. Let's assign man's improbability a random number - 67. So the statistical improbability of man is: 67. According to Dawkin's argument, a God that creates a "67" has to be at least a "67", himself. Now for the sake of argument, let's say that God is just as improbable as man - a 67. (I personally believe God would be more like a 4,505,436,768,982, but just work with me - God has to be at least a 67.) So a 67 creates a 67. Improbable? Yes. Unheard of? By no means.

    Where did you come from?

    You came from a 67. Actually, you came from two 67s. Mother. Father.

    Two statistical improbabilities came together to create another statistical improbability.

    Is that really so improbable? Maybe. Is that the truth? Certainly. Whether you believe in God or not, you must believe in the ability of an improbability to create another (just as unlikely) improbability. It happens every day.

    Cheers,
    Cody
  • reGeneration ::

    Hey everyone,

    I'm getting a blog started up again! I haven't posted in a blog like this for over a year now and a friend () encouraged me to start again. Her name is Esther and you can check her blog out, right here: http://www.cffh.com/esther/

    Cheers,
    Cody

motivated_motion

  • Visit motivated_motion's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 9/22/2007

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.